Bibliografia
Giovanna Trecate

 

 

 

 1. Helleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linnell FS. Invasive Lobular carcinoma. Mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 1991; 178: 149-154. 2. LeGal M, Olliver L, Asselain B et al. Mammographic features of 445 invasive lobular carcinomas. Radiology 1992; 185:705-708. 3. Newstead GM, Baute PB, Toth HK. Invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma. Mammographic findings and stage at diagnosis. Radiology 1992; 184: 623-627. 4. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesley KL, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:247-267. 5. Dao TH, Rahmouni A, Campana F, Laurent M., Asselain B, Fourquet A. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinuim-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 187: 751-755. 6. Hewang-Kobrunner Sh, Schlegel A, Beck R, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:891-900. 7. Heywang-Kobrunner Sh, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Europ J of Radiology 1997; 24(2): 94-108. 8. Rodenko GN, Harms SE, Pruneda JM, Farrell RS, Evans WP, Copit DS, Krakos PA, Flaming DP. MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. AJR 1996; 167:1415-1419. 9. Linell F, Ljungberg O. Carcinomas. In: Atlas of breast pathology. Copenhagen: Munksgaad; 1984: 200-214. 10. Holland R, Hendriks JH, Mravunac M. Mammographically occult breast cancer. Cancer 1983; 52: 1810-1819. 11. Rosen PP. The pathology of invasive breast carcinoma. In Harris JR, Hellman S, Henderson IC, Kinne DW, eds. Breast disease, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1991: 272-276. 12. Heywang-Kobrunner S. Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast. Investigative Radiology 1994; 29 vol. 1: 94-104. 13. Watt AC, Ackerman LV, Windham PJP et al. Breast lesions: differential diagnosis using digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1986; 159: 39-42. 14. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma N. Engl J Med 1991; 324:1-8. 15. Gilles R, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, et al. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. J.Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20(1):9-14. 16. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Tardivon A. Non palpable breast tumors: Diagnosis by using dynamic contrast enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 89(P):105. 17. Kaiser W. False-Positive result in dynamic MR Mammography. Causes, frequency and methods to avoid. MRI Clinics of North America 1994; 2:539-555. 18. Boetes C, Barentz JO, Mus RD et al. MR Characterization of Suspicious Breast Lesiond with a Gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH Dynamic Subtraction Technique. Radiology 1993; 18 9(P):301. 19. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Toussaint C, et al. Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Contrast-enhanced Subtraction MR Imaging of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy. Radiology 1994; 191:633-638. 20. Heywang S, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eirmann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171:95-103. 21. Kaiser W, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989; 170:681-686. 22. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Cobb MB et al. Breast disease. Tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990; 174:491.

 

 Leadership Medica®
Mensile di scienza  medica e attualita`
 Copyright 1997© All Rights Reserved