|
Passim.
“Caryopsis “ insinuates mortal assonances, evoking the image of an inexorable
insect devoted to rot and oxidise the health of what he rots, a “woodworm
of health “, that to make healthy the rice oil is (luckily!) set apart
for principle and since the beginning. Indeed - the explanation results
unequivocal - the rice oil extraction is made “after setting apart the
caryopsis “. Since the “caryopsis “ is not other but the grain, if it
is not made of grains (called “caryopsis “ so it is less noted, and
further ...and then the amid oil...), of what is done this rice oil?
More clearly, some of the scientific works mentioned and deserved to
physicians, write about rice bran oil “.
Meaning
this case, since that with rice it is not made mainly flour, not the
residual of milling but the residual of husking. Remembered the evangelic
“separating the grain from ryegrass “, let's go on our navigation on
board of the dictionary to disentangle from the smoke curtains round
the “rice oil”. So “Husking: winnowing of the paddy from the husk”;
“Husk: a by-product of the husking, constituted by the leaves that envelope
the grains; symbol of physical and moral weakness: 'he's a husk man'”.
With the “husk” we are still there, since it is the “trash represented
by the envelope of the grains, specially cereals “.
Summing up: while rice grains (so to not understand well, pointed out
as “caryopsis “) are normally traded, with the residual from their husking
and winnowing, the husk and the hull, residuals to which belong in a
very little percentage also (they say minimally also) the embryo of
the grain (I beg your pardon: of the caryopsis), the germen, the oil
of rice is produced. Husk and hull are indeed overheated (“toasted”),
so dehumified and finally pressed and depurated for the rectification,
usually with chemical solvents as for the refuses of processed olives
oil, to which the “rice oil “ (that it would be clearer to point at
as “oil of rice bran”) must be, by a productive point of view, related
to. All that in order to the clearness about the origin of the “rice
oil “.
About the therapeutic effects declared in the “information reserved
to physicians “ - where one reads, “it reduces up to 40 per cent the
cholesterol bond to the LDL and the concentration of the Apolipoproteins
B” and “the tryglicerids in the haematic circulation till 25 per cent”
- we have no means to tell about.
We may just note that the related, very serious scientific works recalled
expressly in library are: Nicolosi and others: “Lipoproteins levels
in monkeys nourished with a rice oil containing diet “; “Circulation”
88, 1989 and Sasaki/ Takada/ Honda/ Kusada/ Tanabe/ Matsunaga and Arakava,
“Effects of the gamma-orizanolo in lipids and serum apoliproteins in
schizophrenic hyperlipidemics administered with major tranquillizer
“; Clin. Therapeutics 12, 1990. We won't surely be us to make racism
against our strict relatives and biological stand-ins laboratory monkeys,
about whose most vegetarian frame lipidic metabolism, notwithstanding,
we recall attention. And less we would make racism against the poor
schizophrenic hyperlipidemics undergoing heavy pharmacological therapies.
But about the interactions between narcoleptics drugs and their neurovegetative
metabolic activity, we have some meaningful perplexity. Did you laugh?
I would say not.
|
