Year XVI -Issue. 07 - 2000

 

 

 

 

 

Paolo Pancheri

2/2

A way through which the evolution of psychiatry and its future trends can be pinpointed is by analysing the increase in the number of scientific publications in the various areas of psychiatric interest over the last few years. Since the 60s, the number of articles on psychiatric genetics has increased tremendously and has simply soared in the last decade (FIG. 2).

A lot of these studies concern molecular genetics and are focused on identifying genic vulnerability complexes with respect to single psychiatric problems. Special importance is given, within these genetic studies, to identifying "endophenotypes" (phenotypes related to specific encephalic problems), to the isolation of new psychiatric phenotypes no longer based on categorial diagnostics, but on psychopathologic dimensions, and on the relationship of these new phenotypes to genic vulnerability complexes (FIG. 3). These new approaches to psychiatric genetics are the foundations for the creation of a new epidemiology, of a new prevention of the risk of illnesses and, finally, they open the road to future genic therapy of psychiatric ailments (FIG. 4) Another area of study in which there has been an exponential growth in research works published is the sector of biochemical psychiatry (FIG. 5).

Biochemical psychiatry has been progressively gaining importance over the last ten years, largely because of the progress made in psychopharmacology. We have witnessed a growing interest in animal models for psychiatric disorders. Today, we have quite precise animal models available, as far as some areas of psychopathology is concerned (for example, emotional disorders). These animal models allow scientists to make more complete and precise biochemical hypotheses about mental illness than they could have made in the past. The increased precision in the dosages of cerebral neurotransmitters and the use of pharmacological stimulation tests have allowed for either a confirmation or denial of the biochemical hypotheses, based on animal models.

The results of these biochemical studies, addressed toward mental disorders, have been clearly supported by the studies in clinical pharmacology. By understanding the mechanisms of the pharmocodynamic action of the drugs used in therapy, the observation of the results of treatment allow doctors to perfect the pathogenic hypotheses formulated on the basis of the animal studies and the studies on the dosage of the neurotransmitters. The current limits of the biochemical psychiatry studies are associated with the fact that the data collected from these studies refers to the global nature of the cerebral functioning (or malfunctioning) and do not provide, except in rare cases, specific information on the circuits and structures involved in the specific disorders. Another area of research undergoing intense development is that of the cerebral visualisation. Again in this case, the exponential increase in the scientific publications on this subject bear witness to this development (FIG. 6).

The techniques of visualisation and cerebral mapping of the encephalitic functions are today able to demonstrate how the various cognitive activities, the various emotional states, and psycho-pathological conditions are associated with functional activation and deactivation of groups of cerebral areas both cortical as well as subcortical (7,8) (FIG. 7). Some of these techniques have an elevated complexity (for example the PET), other techniques have become more easy to execute and at the reach of many well-equipped clinical laboratories (for example, the fRMN) (9). The combined use of the morphological investigations (RMN) with the functional techniques (PET, SPECT, fRMN) allows today to have a direct and sequential vision over time of cerebral functioning in areas localisable with significant precision.

Furthermore, the cerebral visualisation techniques applied to the receptor occupation of substances and drugs under both normal (10,11) (FIG. 8) and pathological (12 - 14) conditions have allowed for a greater understanding of the functioning mechanism of the psychoactive substances used in treatment and have offered the ability to construct new interpretational models of psychiatric disorders (15). Naturally, as in all sectors in science, this augmented understanding has created new problems even as far as cerebral visualisation is concerned. For example, the activation - deactivation of the multiple cerebral areas has posed the problem of the possible coincidental relationship existing between the various phenomena observed. In addition to the more conceptual level, the cerebral visualisation has emphasised the risk of a new "phrenology" where individual disorders are associated with individual dysfunctional areas, as happened in the past on a specific anatomical area level. One might naturally ask if an analogous development has occurred in the more traditional framework of psychopathology and clinical psychiatry.

In this broad-based area, one sector that has witnessed a dramatic and exponential increase is the one of the psychometry and the scales of evaluation (FIG. 9). The need to carry out a measurement of the variable psychopathologies has been increasing, especially in the past ten years. It is important to note that for a long time, in psychiatry, there was a tendency to consider the variables characterising psychiatric profiles impossible to measure by quantitative instruments. Progressively, and in greater and greater degree, clinical psychiatrists have come to understand that not only is it possible, but also indispensable to give a numeric measurement to the object of their observations. Today, no work of clinical research is accepted into the international journals unless accompanied by some measure of the variables observed by means of scales of evaluation and by an adequate statistical processing of the results. But even in terms of daily operational practice, clinics have come to learn that the use of these evaluation scales allows for a more precise and dependable objectivity of the state of the patients and the efficacy of the treatment. However, the sector where the greatest increase in the works published has been found, both in terms of absolute numbers as well as in terms of trends, has been in psychopharmacotherapy (FIG. 10).

On the basis of this observation, there has been a progressive increase in the introduction of new psychoactive molecules onto the market as well as their respective studies, prepared both so that the drug might be approved for use and to attain greater precision in its use on a clinical level (efficacy and safety). In fact, the interest in psychopharmacology has been increasing simultaneously with the ever greater efficacy of the treatments and the better and better control over the primary and secondary side effects. In increasing degree, drug therapy has seen its fields of application broaden, and today include the extreme ages of life (16,17), the differences in type, and the entire area of co-morbidity and somatic psychiatry (20). On a more analytical level, it is interesting to observe how the application of the drugs to psychiatric disorders has been moving from a "categorical" point of view to a "dimensional" standpoint (FIG. 11).

This means that rather than associating a drug with a specific illness (defined symptomatically by classification systems) the trend is moving towards the use of drugs, or combinations of drugs, which act on associations of symptoms which imply specific pathophysiological mechanisms. In addition, a tendency already underway and destined to have progressive development, is the research into the correlation between the observable clinical effect and the action of the drug on a level of genic neuronal transcription. The molecular psychiatrist thereby finds a connection to the clinic. Beyond psychopathology and the pharmacological treatments, other areas of psychiatry appear to be in growth phases. One of these areas is represented by social assistance and psychosocial interventions (FIG. 12). There has been a collective new awareness that the treatment for psychiatric disturbances must necessarily be multidimensional. Especially as far as serious psychiatric disorders are concerned, such as major psychosis, even if the pharmacological intervention represents the basis of the treatment, a complete recovery by the patient and his/her reinsertion into the social structures must be subjected to rehabilitation interventions which are the responsibility of specialised assistance structures. The current trends, as far as the non-drug treatments are concerned, are seeing a progressive increase in the brief and minimally structured psychotherapies, the multidimensional team interventions, and programmed rehabilitation.

A sector in continual expansion and destined to enjoy a growth in interest over the next few years is ethical psychiatry (FIG. 13). The problems of ethical psychiatry involve the doctor on a research level as well as a clinical level and have three important aspects. The first is of a more strictly legal nature and regards the doctor understanding and adapting his practice to the regulations guiding his profession. The second aspect concerns the application of the deontological code when dealing with the psychiatric patient who demonstrates more complex problems compared with any other medical patient. The third aspect is of a more strictly moral character and concerns the operative decisions of the psychiatrist, even once he has observed the legal regulations and the deontological standards that preside over his profession. We should expect to see growing attention paid to ethical, deontological, and legal problems over the coming years, both in terms of clinical activity as well as in the research by the psychiatrist and the problem of getting consent for treatment will be a crucial point in this discussion.

Clinical research in psychiatry is destined to be ever more regulated, complex and expensive, while the human rights of the mentally ill will be increasingly protected. In this continual rise in understanding, the change in the conceptual models, and the constantly multiplying requests for help and assistance by larger and larger groups of the population, it is not be easy to foresee that will await us over the next few years. One thing is certain and that is that psychiatry is destined to assume an increasingly important role among the medical professions, filling the gap which still today partly exists, between the traditional image and its real impact on the complex modern society in which we live.

Click Here!