| While
controls over all products on sale are increasing and becoming
more and more strict, consumers associations can intervene in a more sharp
way; while against the deceiving advertising 'juries' are created and heavy
judgements are delivered against the trespassers; while the Warrantor
for Privacy studies every day new norms for citizen tutelage, all this
does not happen when it concerns the ideas, the firm believes that the
representative of the State organs express when they propose themselves
to citizens.
An example: Grazia Labate, parliamentarian of the PDS, ex Communist Party, in the interview issued in the “Giornale” on past July 4th, on pag. 8, verbatim declares: “Well, I'm an everlasting single-mother and an out-and-out cohabitant since 24 years, even if I'm a catholic 'diessina'... I think it belongs to the choices of everyone's life among us”. Deputy Labate, nobody denies your freedom to take certain choices, what we denies you is the label you try to haave on, because it does not corresponds to contents. “I'm a catholic 'diessina'” (an ugly neologism that reminds the already famous dioxin): for motives of propriety, you must erase the world “catholic”, that misrepresents the contents of your choice, it is enough to say “I'm a 'diessina'” and all becomes more clear, the contents corresponds to the label. The Minister Rosy Bindi declares that she is a practising Catholic, she takes part to spiritual retreats, so her labels point out the belonging to a professed creed, but behaviours are exactly opposite: it does not belong to 'being catholic' come to terms on the basic matters of Catholicism (abort, divorce, different insemination methods etc.)
|
To
be a Minister is not a an obligation but a choice, further more being Minister
of a government with whom bears opposite to own professed creed thesis
means, at any regard, that it is being used a label pointing out different
from real indications and it is not enough to cavil at reasoning
to justify oneself and change facts.
The President of the Cabinet Romano Prodi attached on his coach the label of the strict anticommunist who would never govern with Rifondazione comunista, while still today he searches like mad the support of Bertinotti. The label, according to the on force norms, does not corresponds to product. Concerning economic matters, it has been carried out privatizations that are only apparent, for they concretize in transferring some companies from the Treasury to other companies of the Treasury: the State privatizes selling to itself. Those are only some examples, the complete list would take a voluminous edition. To appear or to be, that is the problem of our nowadays society. How can we shield from that? How can we change this propension to appear instead of to be and how to bring to foreground the value of being? In the middle of this confusion of rôles it is really paradoxical to have to notice that only His Holiness John Paul II and Fausto Bertinotti write what they really are in very large letter on their labels. His Holiness, the most out-and-out catholic, representative of Christ in earth, proclaims it all over the world; Bertinotti, keeps on saying he is a communist and behaving alike. Are they the only who represents the real alternative? It rest with us to hope and pray the Holy Spirit to do to Bertinotti what He did to Paul on the way to Damask. God's ways are infinite, aren't they perhaps?  |
Leadership
Medica®
Mensile di scienza medica e attualita`
Copyright 1997© All Rights Reserved |
 |
| This page are maintened by
GTM Grafica Service & Network
gtmgraph@coloseum.com |
|