. 
 
 The European lawyer   

The free circulation of people carrying on a legal business is regulated in articles 52-58 and 59-66 of the Treaty of Rome. Such provisions regulate both the right to settle and of the free circulation of services.   
The freedom of settlement  consists in the right for the beneficiary of the Treaty's provisions to move from one member state of the Community to another in order to practice his activity in a continuous and permanent way.   
The supply of services, on the other hand, entails the temporary and casual practice of the professional activity in a state other than the one the professional resides in.  
Article 60 of the Treaty states that the provisions pertaining the free supply of services can be enforced only provided that those pertaining the freedom of settlement aren't, as they mutually exclude. 

 
The free supply of services of the legal profession 
The rules on the free supply of services of the legal profession laid down with directive 77/249/EEC dated March 22, 1977 and absorbed in Italy with the law dated February 9, 1982, n. 31, set down that the lawyer who supplies services may use his own professional qualification written in his native language or in one of the official languages of the state of origin, with the indication of the professional organisation he belongs to or of the jurisdictional bodies before which he can plead according to the involved state's provisions.  
More specifically, such directive draws a distinction between activities in general and those strictly related to a client's representation or defence in a trial or before a Public Authority.  
Within this context, article 4 lays down that the lawyer must comply with the professional rules of the host member state (“with the exception of those pertaining the Italian citizenship requirement, the possession of a law degree, passing the state examination, the obligation to reside within the republic's territory, the entry in the Bar and the oath obligation”), with the exception of the obligations citizens are subject to in their origin member states.  
Article 6 lays down its limitations: obligation to communicate the acceptance of the professional assignment to the involved authority and the involved president of the Bar Association besides the obligation to act along with the lawyer enabled to plead before the involved jurisdiction.  
To tell the truth, it must be said that the last limitation becomes a simple “domiciliation” (cf.judgement dated 25.2.1988 lawsuit 42785 Commission/Germany in “Collection page 1123 which considered it unnecessary to give faculty even towards the local lawyer”).  
When the Italian lawmakers absorbed this directive, they also resolved to add to ban for a lawyer of a member state working in Italy to open a studio or a seat in our territory.  
With reference to the practice of all the other extrajudicial activities, the lawyer must comply with the professional conditions and rules of the origin member state with the exception of some provisions such as those regulating the professional secrecy, the confidential nature in the relationships with other colleagues and the advertising ban. 
 
The criminal lawyer
The above mentioned provisions can be enforced in every branch of the legal practice.  
The criminal lawyer who must plead abroad and defend his client will have to keep into consideration such provisional procedures.  
A lawyer belonging to the host member state and, if necessary, even an interpreter, are necessary even in the case of criminal defence.  
To give an example, within the French state the defending counsel of the foreign country asserts every right and faculty due to the lawyer according to the French criminal proceedings, personally participating in every stage and degree of the process. The sentence deeds and any other communication coming from the host state's Judicial Authority are in fact notified directly to it. 
 
Freedom of settlement for the permanent professional practice 
As far as the free settlement right to practice the legal profession, we must first of all say that last July 4, the Council adopted the common position n. 35/97 that was recently approved without amendments by the European Parliament and whose directive is expected to be soon adopted. The news about this specific topic that will be introduced by such directive will be the object of a short analysis later on. Let's now deal with the Italian provisions currently in force.  
The lawyer who can practice the legal profession and who intends to settle in a different member state and obtain the recognition of his own professional qualification, must refer to the EEC directive dated December 21, 1988 pertaining the general system of recognition of university diplomas that involves professional training lasting at least three years.  
 
Such directive was absorbed in Italy by the legislative decree dated January 27, 1992, n. 115 that, in particular, enables the member state to subordinate the recognition of school qualifications to an adjustment training or an aptitude test in case considerable differences among the training systems exist.  
To recognise the qualification of the legal profession (and of professional accountants as well as of industrial property consultants), article 6 specifically obliges the professional to carry out an aptitude test: “the aptitude test consists in an exam aimed at verifying the deontological professional knowledge and at assessing the professional practice capabilities by keeping into consideration that the applicant is a qualified professional in his origin country” (article 8).  
There is then a complicated recognition procedure to be given to the involved ministry that, in turn, must issue a decree within four months from the application proposal (article 12).  
The recognition essentially entails the right to have access to and practice the profession “in compliance with the conditions of the current provisions in force” (article 13).  
The recognition system of the involved directive put forth by the Italian lawmakers cast worries and doubts concerning community legitimacy about the “stickiness” it might introduce.  
With the forthcoming directive on the legal profession, we will finally have regulations that will keep this profession's specific features into due consideration. 
 
The new community directive 
The so-called “legal directive” which will become operative with the Council's final adoption within a short period of time, is the result of an initiative that was taken in 1992 by the organisation of the Bar associations and adopted by the EEC Commission. It essentially aims at making it easier for lawyers to practice the legal profession or its practice in a country other than the origin one, by allowing them to practice directly with their professional qualification.  
Community lawyers will thus be enabled to give consulting on their origin country's law, on international and community laws, as well as on the host country's; they will also be entitled to represent or defend their clients in trials and, if necessary, along with another lawyer who can plead at the involved judicial body, in another member state.  
Essentially, the lawyer will be able to start automatically practising his profession in the host member state and avoid the aptitude test provided he can prove that he practised an “effective and regular activity” for at least three years in compliance with the host member state or community law.  
The directive also contains some provisions about the professional practice in an associated form.  
These provisions include the possibility of practising a profession in a branch of a state associated with the origin state, as well as the possibility for the lawyers coming from the same origin state to use associative forms laid down by the host state. Finally, they can also practise their profession in association with one or more lawyers coming from different origin states with one or more lawyers from the host state.  
The actual laws in force in the single states and the possibility of banning the existence of associated offices where the decision-making power is exerted by people not practising the legal profession are an exception, however.  
Thus, according to such directive, the lawyer will have to comply with one condition: he will have to register in the involved authority of the host member state and will not have to ask and obtain the recognition.  
Finally, it could be useful to mention the respect of the host state professional and deontological rules: as lawyers must be registered both at the host and the origin state's involved authority, in fact, it must be underlined that they will have to comply with the deontological and professional provisions of the host state in which they regularly practise their working activities.  
To sum up, the legal  picture currently in force in Italy is the following:  
-law dated February 9, 1982, n. 31, lays down the mutual recognition for casual services supplied by lawyers.  
According to such provisions, the lawyer belonging to a legal association can supply services pertaining consultancy, representation and defence in another member state; representation in trials, however, must be done along with a local lawyer;  
-the legislative decree n. 115 dated January 27, 1992 pertaining the free permanent professional practise in a state other than the origin one lays down the recognition and the equivalence of the professional qualification for the other member states.  
Such recognition, however, is subordinate to some strict procedures and to an aptitude test.  
The new directive is added to other directives in force aiming at making professional practice easier within an actually European context.  
Besides the choice of unitary rules to enforce social security and fiscal provisions, some problems about the “terminology” to be used to define the lawyer's qualification recognised in the single member states as well as the services to be carried by special jurisdictional bodies still have to be cleared (suffice it to think, for example, to the double role associated with solicitors and barristers in the United Kingdom).  

Daria Pesce

 
 
 Leadership Medica®  
  Mensile di scienza  medica e attualita`  
 Copyright 1997© All Rights Reserved 
 
 This pages are maintened by  
GTM Grafica 
Service & Network 
gtmgraph@coloseum.com