|
.
Jody
Vender has experienced with evident discomfort the meeting of the
30th last.
Indeed
it has been talked a lot and for a long time about the “dirty
linen” risen in the administration of the controlled Superga
S.p.A. A “cash deficit” having carried - in the balance
of the Sopaf S.p.A. - corrections for per 39.199 millions, bringing
as consequence the closing of the balance with a loss - that of Sopaf
- that could have had a positive result.
What
have turned, and turns more “disagreeable “ the “event”,
is the dutiful statement of the fact that a manager of the Group Leader,
belonging to the Board of Directors of the Controlled, has exercised
the mandate at least with guilty “shallowness”. Indeed
he has backed by the means of his presence and his signature balances
that (as it seems) did not show the numbers related to the stock of
goods and credits corresponding dutifully to the checking in reality.
It
is written as regards to, in the Sioaf's Directors report:
“The
Board Of Directors of Superga S.p.A. has entrusted a special mandate
to two of its components so to evaluate, properly supported by a legal
practice, whether there are or not the premises for an eventual
legal action against the directors that were entrusted, by virtue
of the special authorization and attribution of corresponding powers,
with the management of the Superga S.p.A. and the control of its economic
trend. This purpose the Sopaf S.p.A., since it's the majority partner
of the Superga S.p.A., reserves to evaluate the eventual proposal
of the Board Of Directors of the latter company that will present
at the shareholders meeting.”
For
the “objective “ responsibilities coming from the charges
hold at the Superga, are involved, against their will, even Senator
Franco Debenedetti (President on charge till 21.5.98) and the auditors
Lionello Jona Celesia and Luigi Guatri: the first one has undersigned
and the others have declared on oath balances whose data does not
seem to agree with truth.
Jody
Vender has assumed personally the chairmanship of the Superga so to
follow directly the delicate phase of ascertainments and reorganization.
It
must be acknowledged to him that he accepted a wide debate about the
Superga matter and that he admitted the seriousness of the fact without
relieving himself and the management of the Controller Company of
the corresponding responsibilities.
Vender
paused upon illustrating the check-up the firm has undergone and the
strategy to bring it back to profitability.
Keeping
the sense of proportion the “ cash deficit “ in the Superga's
accounts has evident analogies with that rising out from the evaluation
of the stock books of the RCS and that caused a remarkable scandal.
About
the Superga's “dirty linen” it was not heard the roll
of drums; it was not sounded the trumpets; it seems there are not
investigations in course for “ falsification of the account”:
at least for the moment.
Things
are better like that!
|