| Angiogenesis
and Vasculogenesis
Angiogenesis
involves the sprouting of capillaries from preexisting capillary
beds, resulting in an increased capillary density. In vasculogenesis,
angioblasts are differentiated from mesodermal cells and organized to
form a primitive vascular network.
Vasculogenesis occurs in limited
embryonic sites, while angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels
by sprouting from existing
ones, occurs in many situations containing embryonic development and pathological
conditions (1). Therapeutic angiogenesis is the use of angiogenic strategies
to promote increased capillary development, improving blood flow to ischemic
tissue.
Regulation of vascular growth
is a complex phenomenon, and various authors have proposed many putative
mechanisms of angiogenesis (2). The three main stimuli most commonly considered
are: 1) mechanical factors 2) energy imbalance due to hypoxia and 3) inflammatory
processes.
The most prominent mechanical
factors are a) an increased red blood cell-endothelial cell interaction
as in policytemia, b) an increased wall tension as a result of an
increased capillary pressure, and c) an increased shear stress which occurs
with increased flow velocity.
The energy imbalance hypothesis
regards various situations of prolonged imbalances between the perfusion
capabilities of blood vessels and the metabolic requirements of tissue.
Changes in oxygenation have
been implicated as a major triggering and controlling element.
Finally, Schaper stressed the
importance of inflammatory processes associated with activation of endothelial
cells and angiogenic growth factors (3). A survey of the literature shows
that over fifty putative factors may be involved in angiogenesis. The
list extends from simple ions like copper, magnesium and selenium to complex
growth factors.
The most often cited angiogenic
growth factors are basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (4-7). In addition to the angiogenic
factors above, vascular growth can be further modified and regulated by
local geometric conditions: endothelial size and shape and the location
of other cell types such as smooth muscle cells, pericytes, platelets,
macrophages and mast cells.
The arrangement and composition
of the extracellular matrix can also influence the final response. Therapeutic
angiogenesis is rapidly ongoing in the clinical arena of cardiovascular
diseases. We will briefly review:
1. Evidences supporting the
functional impact of Arterial Collateral Circulation (ACC)
2. Evidences (molecular; cellular;
experimental; and clinical) suggesting a role for cardiovascular drugs
as a ACC promoter
3. Promising strategies to
improve blood flow using new treatment approaches such as recombinant
angiogenic growth factors and human gene transfection to induce growth
factors production.
Development of
collateral circulation: brief overview of mechanisms and meaning
Coronary
collateral circulation
Chronic myocardial ischemia
as occurs with coronary artery stenosis leads to the development of collateral
circulation.
This type of growth of new
blood vessels has been demonstrated in heart and skeletal muscle and results
from a reduction in the oxygen supply/demand ratio (8-10). Collaterals
develop from preexisting anastomotic channels, as a result both of the
establishment of a pressure gradient between their origin and termination
and of chemical mediators; they also develop from newly formed microvessels,
which establish new communications between adjacent vascular beds as a
result of tissue ischemia. The functional role of collaterals is to provide
blood flow that protects against necrosis and ischemia (11,12).
The protection of collaterals
against ischemia is achieved through gradually increasing poststenotic
pressure in the collateralized coronary arterial bed, eventually providing
some flow reserve. Six months after circumflex coronary artery occlusion
in exercising dogs, myocardial blood flow, measured by the microsphere
technique, can increase to the same extent (about 300%) in normal and
collateral-dependent myocardium. In man, coronary collaterals have the
potential to ameliorate myocardial ischemia (13,14). Moreover, myocardial
viability after acute myocardial infarction has been correlated with the
extent of collateral blood flow within the territory of the infarct-related
vessel (15). Coronary collaterals also may limit enzymatic estimates of
infarct size (16) and may prevent formation of left ventricular aneurysm
in acute myocardial infarction (17).
Peripheral
circulation.
The peripheral vasculature
is a complex and fascinating organ that is associated with a very unique
disease: the course of peripheral artery disease is one of slow progression
of symptoms over time. Approximately 70% of patients will remain unchanged
or become even less symptomatic after 5 to 10 years, <30% will progress
to require intervention, and <10% will need amputation.
The development of collateral
circulation after ligation of the left iliac artery was studied in rats
by means of microsphere distribution in muscles of both lower limbs (18).
Flow in the thigh increased from 43% of control value 20 min after ligation
to 70% after 26 days of recovery; flow in calf muscles increased correspondingly
from 4% to 33%. In dogs, ischemia was created in the leg by ligation of
the proximal and peripheral arteries (19); in one month, intermittent
claudication improved in accordance with improvement in muscle tissue
perfusion, angiographic evidence of distal runoff became visible six months
after surgery. Plethysmographic course controls in patients at the age
between 70 and 76 years showed that the maximum of the collateral blood
supply in arteriosclerosis in the femoral region is reached 2 years at
the latest after vascular occlusion (20). Therefore, although a functional
role of collaterals has been debated, conclusive experimental and consistent
clinical evidences suggest that collateral development occurs as an adaptive
response to arterial occlusive disease (16,17); however, individuals vary
widely in their propensity for collateral growth, and the possibility
exists that collateral development could be enhanced pharmacologically
(4-7, 21,22).
CARDIOVASCULAR
DRUGS AND ANGIOGENESIS
The
Heparin Factor in Arterial Collateral Circulation.
Evidences favoring a role of
heparin in arterial collateral circulation (ACC) development stem from
experimental and clinical evidences.
Experimental evidences. A large
number of mast cells gather around rapidly growing capillaries, but mast
cells alone do not cause angiogenesis. Azizkhan et al demonstrated that
mast cells increase endothelial cell migration as the earliest event in
the formation of a capillary sprout, and this endothelial migration is
accelerated by heparin (23). In 1982, Taylor and Folkman demonstrated
that heparin could facilitate angiogenesis induced by tumor extracts from
human hepatoma cells implanted in the chorioallantoic membrane of chick
embryos (24). Thus these data suggested a new function of heparin as a
positive regulator of angiogenesis (25) (Table I). This probably occurs
through interactions with a family of polypeptide growth factors mitogens
that stimulate endothelial cell proliferation. Basic fibroblast growth
factor (bFGF) is one such peptide. This factor is now recognized to be
a mitogen for the three principal-vascular cell types (endothelial cells,
smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts) and is chemotactic for endothelial
cells in vitro. The bFGF produced in endothelial cells is sequestered
in the extracellular matrix and basement membranes and bonds to heparin
or heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans, which may protect FGF from degradation
and serve to chaperone bFGF through different cellular compartments (26-28).
Another heparin-binding growth
factor is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), whose mitogenic activity
appears to be specific for endothelial cells and not for vascular smooth
muscle (29,30). VEGF receptors have been identified on the cell
surface of endothelial cells. VEGF is a potent stimulus to angiogenesis
in the ischemic limb of rabbits and in the ischemic myocardium (29,30).
The binding of VEGF to the VEGF receptors of vascular endothelial cells
was potentiated by heparin or heparan sulfate, but not by other glycosaminoglycans.
The bFGF may promote angiogenesis both by direct effect on endothelial
cells and also indirectly by the upregulation of VGEF in vascular smooth
muscle cells (31,32). Heparin induces a conformational change in
the growth factor that allows it to interact with its receptor on the
cell surface, protects it from inactivation, potentiates its activity,
and releases it from the extracellular matrix, thereby making this factor
available for interaction with endothelial cells.
Heparin-binding growth factors
are postulated to remain, under normal physiologic conditions, sequestered
in myocytes, extracellular matrix, or the endothelial cell membrane. Ischemia,
which is associated with cellular hypoxia, acidosis, and an increase in
adenosine, triggers the release of these heparin-binding growth factors
(31). Once these factors are activated, they act locally to initiate and/or
to mantain angiogenesis. Heparin and/or heparan sulfate per se are unable
to trigger angiogenesis but act as a positive modulator (enhancer or amplifier)
of angiogenetic processes triggered by other stimuli.
Clinical
evidences: coronary circulation. Fujita et al evaluated 16 patients,
10 of whom were heparin-treated, who had at least one obstructed major
coronary artery and chronic angina on effort (Table II). All patients
exercised following the standard Bruce protocol twice a day for ten days
(33). The 10 heparin-treated patients were given a single intravenous
dose of heparin 5000 IU, ten to twenty minutes before each exercise test,
and the remaining 6 patients exercised without the heparin treatment.
Total exercise duration and maximal rate pressure product were increased
by about 35% by heparin treatment. Further coronary arteriography revealed
a significant increase in the extent of collateral circulation to the
region perfused by the completely obstructed coronary artery in patients
treated with heparin. In another study from the same group, it was shown
that heparin treatment alone, without exercise (34), was unable to improve
ischemia on exercise (Table II). Quyyumi et al studied 23 patients with
stable coronary artery disease who received low-molecular-weight heparin
or corresponding placebo (35). During the first two weeks, patients were
exercised to ischemia three times a day. Eight (80%) of the 10 heparin-treated
patients compared with the 4 (31%) of 13 placebo-treated patients (p<0.02)
had an increased rate-pressure product at the onset of one minute of ST
segment depression.
The number and duration of
episodes of ST segment depression during ambulatory monitoring decreased
by 30% and 35%, respectively (p<0.05) in the heparin-treated group
but were unchanged in the placebo-treated group.
Clinical
evidences: peripheral circulation
Mannarino et al evaluated 44
patients, 22 of whom were heparin treated, who had chronic intermittent
claudication. The 22 heparin-treated patients were given for six months
a single daily subcutaneous dose (15,000 UaXa) of LMW heparin (36). Heparin
treatment improved walking capacity (by lengthening the pain-free walking
time by 25%) in comparison with the absence of changes occuring in patients
treated with placebo.
Andreozzi et al evaluated 40
patients suffering from peripheral arteriopathies of the lower limbs:
patients were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups, receiving
either 12,500 IU/day of subcutaneous calcium heparin or 250 mg/day of
oral ticlopidine (37), each given for three months: both calcium heparin
and ticlopidine induced at the end of treatment an improvement in pain
free walking distance (51% and 32% respectively), less effective for ticlopidine
than for calcium heparin.
Cina et al studied 374 patients
suffering from chronic arteriopathy, instructed to follow a programme
of physical training and randomly allocated to calcium heparin (12,500
IU daily) for 6 months (38). An improvement in the claudicatio parameters
(free gait interval, absolute gait interval and recovery time) measured
at constant speed and in the resting Winsor ankle-to-arm index of the
most severely damaged limb were observed in both groups. These improvements
were significantly greater in the group receiving heparin treatment (80%
vs 28% of exercise alone, p<0.01) and efficacy increased in line with
deambulatory impairment at baseline, before study entry.
Altogether, these findings
suggest that heparin facilitates collateral development stimulated by
exercise-induced ischemia in humans.
Since heparin in itself and
by itself has no angiogenetic properties, it should be evaluated more
appropriately as an”add-on” therapy, on the top of a promoter stimulus
such as increase in endogenous adenosine, obtained by regular exercise
program and/or by drugs determining accumulation of endogenous adenosine
such as dipyridamole.
Calcium
antagonists and angiogenesis: an experimentally supposed stimulating effect
with poor clinical demonstration
Some experimental findings
support a positive modulation of angiogenesis by calcium antagonists.
Rakusan (1) described quantitative evaluations of vascular growth in cardiac
muscle with examples of substantial angiogenesis in the early postnatal
stages, together with examples depicting a more moderate stimulation of
capillary growth in adult rat hearts treated with nifedipine. Treatment
with nifedipine resulted in a moderate capillary growth along the entire
pathway, as evidenced by smaller capillary domains, longer segment lenghts,
and unchanged proportion of proximal and distal capillaries in tissue
cross sections (2). The Authors suggested that in this angiogenic
response the major effect of nifedipine is due to mechanical stimuli resulting
from chronically increased coronary blood flow.
Saito (39) in a placebo controlled
study suggested that increased syntesis of bFGF and their receptors may
be related to the patogenesis of nifedipine induced gingival hyperplasia
in humans.
Calcium antagonists are a wide
class of drugs, with different concentration-related effects on voltage
operated calcium channels, receptor operated calcium channels and
store operated calcium channels (40). Although some reports exist
about the role of calcium-mediated signal transduction and angiogenesis
(41), only in the work of Saito (39) there is a direct evidence of relation
between nifedipine therapy and specific mRNA bFGF expression in humans.
A possible link between calcium channel blockade and vascular tissue remodeling
has been recently found with the demonstration of interleukine 6 induction
by calcium antagonists (42) ; interleukine 6 essentially partecipates
in the control of the cell proliferation and induces production of VEGF.
All 3 subclasses of calcium antagonists increased interleukine-6 promoter
activity.
Amlodipine, diltiazem, and
verapamil, at nanomolar concentrations, stimulated interleukine-6 promoter
activity to 214%, 282%, and 292% of unstimulated controls, respectively.
Interleukine-6 induction by calcium antagonists was independent of intracellular
calcium concentrations, suggesting that calcium antagonists affect expression
by a different, calcium-independent mechanism. Further study are certainly
needed to support the observed relationship between angiogenetic factors
and concomitant drug therapy with calcium antagonists.
Nitrates
and angiogenesis: nitric oxide promotes proliferation through endogenous
bFGF
Myocardial
vascularity increases in response to chronic alveolar hypoxia (eg, altitude
hypoxia) or cardiac hypermetabolism (eg, hyperthyroidism, augmented preload
or afterload, increased inotropy) and after coronary ischemia.
A common denominator in all
these chronic conditions is the sustained elevation of coronary blood
flow in the regions that will later exhibit neovascularization. A number
of molecules (eg, adenosine and vascular endothelial growth factor) released
from hypoxic tissue have received attention as potential linkages between
angiogenesis and myocardial function (43). However, the rate of coronary
blood flow itself may be an important physical determinant of coronary
angiogenesis (44).
Continuous administration of
coronary vasodilators leads to augmented myocardial vascularity, and a
role for the endothelium-derived relaxing factor, nitric oxide (NO), has
been postulated. Coronary postcapillary venular endothelium exposed to
the NO showed increased DNA synthesis. The expression of the angiogenic
factor bFGF was increased in endothelial cells treated with sodium nitroprussiate
and with the NO dependent vasodilating peptide substance P. It was shown
that the expression of the growth factor is under the control of the NO
pathway via an autocrine/paracrine loop (45).
In microvascular endothelium
the elevation of intracellular NO induces the endogenous production of
angiogenic factors that makes the capillary endothelium acquire the feature
of an “angiogenic endothelium” (as for increased proliferative and degradative
capacity). These findings indicate that elevation of NO levels in coronary
endothelium increases endogenous bFGF production: vasodilation is coupled
to angiogenesis, revealing a feedback loop controlled by the endothelium
via NO and bFGF. Clinical demonstration of these experimental data is
completely lacking.
Chronic
Oral Dipyridamole as a “Novel” Antianginal Drug: the collateral hypothesis
Background: dipyridamole is
an adenosine transport blocker that produces elevation of tissue adenosine
levels.
The oral formulation has long
been used as a “coronary vasodilator”, but inappropriate vasodilation
can lead to a proischemic effect. However, in an hypoxic milieu increased
interstitial adenosine can promote angiogenesis.
Experimental data suggest that
chronic treatment with dipyridamole increases collateral flow and decreases
exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction in the territory dependent
upon a critical coronary stenosis.
The rationale for its antiischemic
effect was even too obvious: myocardial ischemia is believed to result
from imbalance between oxygen supply and demand, dipyridamole markedly
increases oxygen supply without significantly augmenting oxygen demand,
thus it should re-establish the normal oxygen balance (46). Although initial
uncontrolled studies were encouraging, dipyridamole has been subsequently
discared for this application on the basis of inconsistent results in
placebo controlled trials, mainly showing a lack of an acute or short-term
protective effect.
Oral dipyridamole therapy in
myocardial ischemia: the time factor.
Chronic myocardial ischemia
as occurs with coronary artery stenosis leads to the development of collateral
circulation. This type of growth of new blood vessels has been demonstrated
in heart and skeletal muscle and results from a reduction in the oxygen
supply/ demand ratio . It has been shown that adenosine is involved in
this angiogenic effect of the reduced oxygen supply (47). In support of
this concept, it has been demonstrated that low oxygen concentrations
(2%) increased proliferation of endothelial cells in culture (47) by stimulating
A1 and A2 adenosine receptors present on the endothelial cells surface
(48). Very recent studies showed that endogenous adenosine produced by
ischemia induces Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor mRNA in the heart.
Furthermore, dipyridamole increased the formation of capillaries in the
rat and rabbit hearts (49). In the presence of a critical coronary stenosis,
adenosine acts as a regulator of endogenous growth factors triggered by
repeated episodes of ischemia.
The beneficial antischemic
effect of coronary collateral circulation should require several weeks
to become detectable, and probably a few months to plateau. More recently,
it has been experimentally shown that chronic long-term treatment with
dipyridamole increased collateral flow and improved transmural blood flow
and systolic wall thickening during exercise-induced ischemia, with a
beneficial protective antischemic effect more marked than the one exerted
by diltiazem (50).
From the clinical viewpoint,
a 1988 meta-analysis of all 11 published randomized placebo-controlled
trials evaluating the efficacy of dipyridamole for prophylaxis of angina
pectoris showed that there was evidence of a statistically significant
benefit from the drug (51). Therefore, the final result of the meta-analysis
of all published trials documents a beneficial effect of dipyridamole
in treating ischemia. If the collateral circulation pathway is indeed
activated, one should expect that studies with longer duration of treatment
show the greatest benefit. In dogs, collaterals often reach their full
development and remain available for at least 4 months after the obstruction.
Once the benefit of collateral
circulation has been developed, weeks and months of therapy withdrawal
are not enough to lose it.
Other non-pharmacological treatments,
such as enhanced external counterpulsation, thought to act by improving
collateral circulation are characterized by a beneficial effect emerging
over several weeks but long lasting, even for years after discontinuation
of treatment .
THE
GENE THERAPY REVOLUTION: RECOMBINANT VEGF, BFGF AND GENE TRANSFECTION
TO INDUCE ANGIOGENESIS IN HUMANS
Numerous
animal and human trials are currently underway to assess the safety and
efficacy of angiogenic growth factors in the treatment of ischemic
heart disease (52). While many growth factors have been identified,
the mayority of research has involved vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF).
Recombinant
growth factors delivery in humans
Initial
experiences with local FGF delivery during CABG. Twenty-four patients
were randomized in a trial comparing local delivery of recombinant FGF
with placebo at the time of cononary artery by pass surgery: high dose
FGF (100 mcg) were administered.
The efficacy data appeared
promising. There seemed to be improved myocardial perfusion, determined
by nuclear an magnetic resonance imaging. FGF delivery was safe, feasible
and well tolerated, and a phase II trial is currently underway.
Phase I Intracoronary and Intravenous
FGF. To assess the safety and efficacy of intracoronary (IC) and intravenous
(IV) recombinant FGF, 66 patients with severe CAD unsuitable candidates
for angioplasy or bypass surgery, received either IC FGF (n=52) or IV
FGF (n=14). The efficacy data appear promising. Patients increased their
treadmill exercise time compared with baseline testing. Regional wall
motion and perfusion improved in a subgroup of patients undergoing magnetic
resonance imaging.
Phase I recombinant VEGF IC
administration. The Phase I intracoronary VEGF administration trial showed
that while recombinant VEGF was safe and well tolerated, no significant
difference in exercise time or angina scores is present comparing VEGF
to control arms.
Growth Factors: Unanswered
Questions. It is unclear which growth factor is the best. The optimal
mode of delivery remains to be determined.
Researchers are also struggling
with determining the best endpoint in these angiogenesis trials. Finally,
whether delivering growth factor protein versus gene therapy is superior
awaits further investigation.
Gene
transfection in humans
to induce angiogenesis
Because
no recombinant protein formulation of any of the three principal VEGF
isoforms is currently approved or available for human
clinical application, arterial gene transfer of VEGF has been investigated
as an alternative strategy for accomplishing therapeutic angiogenesis
in patients with ischemia.
Administration of VEGF in this
fashion is particularly appealing because the first exon of the VEGF gene
includes a signal sequence that permits the protein to be naturally secreted
from intact cells.
Previous studies (53) suggested
that arterial gene transfer of cDNA encoding for a screted protein could
potentially yield meaningful biological outcomes despite a low transfection
efficacy.
Phase I intracoronary gene
therapy trial. In a double-blind study randomized patients received VEGF
plasmids (n=10) or placebo (n=5) following coronary angioplasty: an infusion
perfusion catheter was used for the 10 minutes intracoronary administration.
This phase I trial did show
that gene transfer after angioplasty appears to be safe and well tolerated.
Despite these encouraging findings
candidates for growth factors gene therapy has exposed certain potential
limitations of arterial gene transfer: in atherosclerotic patients, even
in the absence of a thickened neointima, extensive calcific deposits at
the intimal medial interface, may limit gene transfer to the smooth muscle
cells of the arterial media.
Intramuscolar gene therapy
trials. IM gene transfer, which was pioneered by Wolff and colleagues,
represents a less invasive alternative to arterial transfection. Striated
muscle has been shown to take up and express foreign genes transferred
in the form of “naked” plasmid DNA, ie, DNA unassociated with viral or
other adjunctive vectors.
IM gene transfer of naked plasmid
DNA would be potentially advantageous because it obviates immunological
concerns associated with adenoviral vectors (54).
Because naked plasmid DNA injected
IM remains in a nonreplicative, unintegrated, circular form, this strategy
also is unlikely to be complicated by insertional mutagensis.
Accordingly, studies was undertaken
to test the hypothesis that IM injection of naked plasmid DNA encoding
the 165 amino acid isoform of VEGF could augment collateral development
and tissue perfusion in the setting of experimentally induced hind limb
ischemia.
In a initial number of patients
with hind limb ischemia IM plasmid VEGF transfection was successefully
attempted by the group of Isner and coworkers in Boston (55).
This study was the first to
demonstrate the feasibility of the IM gene trasfection of naked DNA encoding
VEGF for therapeutic angiogenesis in particular and the first to show
bioactivity of naked DNA after IM transfection for cardiovascular therapy
in general.
VEGF gene transfer works as
sole therapy for medically resistant angina. Recently performed experiments
in a porcine model of myocardial ischemia have shown how direct
intramyocardial gene transfer of VEGF can be safely and successeful achieved
via a minimally invasive chest wall incision.
Accordingly, a phase I, dose
escalating, open-label clinical study to determine the safety and bioactivity
of direct myocardial gene tranfer of naked plasmid DNA encoding VEGF was
undertaken (56). Gene transfer was the sole therapy, performed without
concomitant angioplasty, stenting or bypass graft, in patients with symptomatic
myocardial ischemia. All the 16 enrolled patients experienced marked symptomatic
improvement and objective evidence of improved myocardial perfusion.
At the latest follow-up of
90 days, 6 of 11 patients were free of angina. Thirteen out of 14 patients
showed evidence of reduced ischemia by SPECT-sestamibi myocardial perfusion.
Coronary angiography showed evidence of new collateral vessel development
in 12/13 patients at 60 day follow-up.
This early clinical experience,
although encouraging, leaves several issues unresolved. Optimizing the
anatomic site, number, and dose of intramyocardial injections will require
further investigation.
The strategy of gene therapy
alone administered via a mini-thoracotomy does not permit randomization
against placebo (untreated controls).
We anticipate that incorporation
of a lacebo group as well a clinical testing of alternative dosing regimens
— including multiple treatments — will be addressed upon availability
of a catheter-based systems for reliable percutaneous myocardial gene
delivery.
Such systems are currently
under investigation in several laboratories.
Tonino Bombardini
Servizio Tecnologie Biomediche
Policlinico S.Orsola - Bologna |