What
is Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery ?
Different
groups of patients have different concerns and demands for less invasive
surgery.
Will I awake after the operation?
How much pain will there be? When will I be able to return to work,
physical and sports activities? How long will it take for my incision
to heal, and what will the scar be like? Most of these concerns and
demands are focused on comfort, cosmesis, and rehabilitation, which
are all affected by the degree of invasiveness.
The
objective factors, affecting the degree of invasiveness of cardiac surgery
are the surgical approach and cardiopulmonary bypass.
* The surgical approach is
comprised of and will determine
* the length of the skin
incision and the associated amount of visible scar tissue
* the degree of aggression
to muscle-, connective- and bone tissue, which is affected by the amount
of contusion and coagulation
* the deformation of the
thoracic cavity
* the loss of blood
* the amount of pain and
discomfort
* the ventilatory problems
* the amount of anesthetic
or analgetic drugs needed
* the occurrence of devastating
complications, such as sternitis and mediastinitis.
* There are several options
for cardiopulmonary bypass: operate on the beating heart without extracorporeal
circulation
(1) install conventional
cardiopulmonary bypass and operate on a fibrillating or arrested heart
and
(2) use the new EndoCPB(tm)
System (Heartport(r), Redwood City, CA) for endocardiopulmonary bypass,
arresting the heart with an endoaortic clamp.
However, cardiopulmonary
bypass has several objective problems including hemolysis, heparin-rebound
phenomena, complement activation, and deterioration of the immune system.
There are also subjective factors that affect the degree of invasiveness
of cardiac surgery, such as poor appetite, insomnia, depression, visual,
memory, or intellectual deficits, and loss of sexual ability.
Less
invasive cardiac surgery is trendy. To be able to compare different
ways to lessen the aggression of cardiac surgery in a way, to classify
this new type of surgery is definitively needed. This is a proposal
to establish 4 categories:
A. Direct Coronary Artery
Surgery on the beating heart
B. Limited or modified approaches,
with ECC for a wider array of surgical corrections
C. MIDCAB: Minimally Invasive
Direct Coronary Artery Bypass surgery: via a minimal approach a thoracoscopically
harvested arterial bypass is anastomosed to LAD on the beating heart
D. True Port-AccessTM Cardiac
Surgery with ECC for all sorts of cardiac pathology.
These
methods have different degrees of invasiveness, may introduce additional
risk or make the conversion to conventional surgery more or less difficult
and have different learning curves. The possibility of additional risk
and the length of the learning curve are affected by the changes in
instrumentation, including stabilizers, special retractors, trocar ports,
and smaller shafted instruments, the change in visualization to partial
or complete video assistance and new ways to install Extra-Corporeal
circulation.
The
Classification:
A. Direct Coronary Artery
Bypass Surgery on the beating heart without Extracorporeal Circulation:
Off-Pump CABG or OPCAB
Coronary artery bypass surgery
via sternotomy without extracorporeal circulation is for the most part
conventional and can only be considered less invasive because the complications
of extracorporeal circulation are avoided. Because cardiopulmonary bypass
is not used, stabilizers are necessary to immobilize the distal anastomotic
site, although conventional forceps are needle holders are used to perform
the anastomoses, and visualization is also conventional. Hence the learning
curve is rather short. There is the risk of partial revascularization,
but conversion to conventional surgery is not difficult. Specific indications
for this type of surgery are single vessel disease, previous or current
malignancy, hemodialysis, severe pulmonary insufficiency, advanced age,
poor ejection fraction, calcified aortic root and arch, redo situations,
recent history of cerebral hemorrhage, and a patient who is a Jehovah's
Witness.
A
particular technology has been developed by several companies to “stabilize”
the anastomotic site like the CTSTM or the OctopusTM stabilizer. In
many centers both surgeons and anesthesiologists have elaborated technicities
to work on the beating heart without compromising the hemodynamic status
of the patient. Whether or not full revascularization with as many arterial
grafts and as good results as with cardiopulmonary bypass can be achieved
remains to be seen.
There are no obvious reports yet that there are significant benefits
for the patients undergoing OPCAB. Fig 1.
B.
Limited or modified approaches using conventional techniques and instruments
Many alternative approaches
have been described that lessen the damage to the thoracic cavity: the
partial T or L sternotomy through the 3rd or 4th intercostal space,
the reversed T sternotomy, the transverse sternotomy, parasternotomy
with excision of two or more costal cartilages, and various types of
anterolateral minithoracotomies. The surgical techniques are fairly
conventional, so the learning curve is short, but conversion to conventional
surgery is more difficult. Extracorporeal circulation can be either
conventional or with the EndoCPB(tm) System. Visualization is conventional,
but special retractors are required.
There is an array of limited
or modified approaches, including midline sternotomy, hemisternotomy,
reverse T sternotomy, and J sternotomy to the left or right through
the 3rd or 4th intercostal space or on a parasternal axis.
Specific
indications for these procedures include redo situations, previous sternitis
and mediastinitis, severe pulmonary insufficiency, or disorder of the
ventilatory muscles. These approaches reduce the aggression to the thoracic
cavity and the amount of pain, and the thoracic cavity is more stable
after hemisternotomy or J sternotomy, which will most certainly benefit
some patients. Comfort and cosmesis may also be improved, and some patients
will have a shorter rehabilitation period. However, is this truly minimally
invasive cardiac surgery, or is it simply “fashionable” minimally invasive
cardiac surgery?
C.
Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass : MIDCAB
*
Introduction
Minimally invasive direct
coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is an anastomosis of a short or long
pedicle of an arterial graft, most commonly the internal mammary artery
(IMA) to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (95%) or the right
coronary artery on the beating heart via a parasternal or left anterior
small thoracotomy.
The value, even in the extended
18- to 20-year term, of bypass from an IMA to the LAD is well documented
in the literature and, in the off-pump and minithoracotomy setting,
extremely costeffective. Thus it is a valid alternative for endovascular
procedures. In 2- or 3-vessel disease, it may be a part of a well-designed
hybrid therapy protocol. It is most definitely minimally invasive, and
epidural anesthesia can provide additional comfort to the patient. However,
the learning curve is difficult, and conversion to conventional surgery
can be cumbersome. Special retractors and stabilizers are required,
although visualization may be conventional or video-assisted.
*
Technique
The patient is positioned
in dorsal decubitus. In the left breast groove, the skin is incised
over about 7 cm, the subcutaneous layer tissue is divided, and the 5th
rib is reached.
A Bookwalter(tm) mammary
retractor is then fixed to the edge of the operating table. It has multiple
articulations and can gently lift up and stabilize the upper rib by
means of two hooked arms and fixate a solid aperture. On the front axillary
line, a thoracic port is inserted and allows the camera eye to have
a look into the left Thoracic cavity. We use a standard OTVS5 camera
head with a 10-mm 0o autoclavable thorascope.. The right lung is then
selectively ventilated, the left lung collapsing. One can immediately
observe the left phrenic nerve and the beating heart under the pericardium.
The dissection of the left internal mammary artery is started in the
middle of its course with a long well-protected diathermy tip. With
a curved forceps and scissors it can be continued towards the top of
the pleural cavity.
All instruments are introduced
through the fixed aperture of the 5th intercostal space, while the eyes
of the surgeon are focused on the screen. Cautious dissection and preservation
of the left mammary artery is possible.
Moreover, it's sometimes
easier than from the angle of the median sternotomy. The images of the
screen allow the LIMA to be taken away from the sternum up to the level
of the left subclavian vein. In most of the cases, the aperture of the
5th intercostal space does not allow both direct view into the operating
field and the introduction of the necessary instruments simultaneously.
This technique of video-assisted
harvesting of the left internal mammary allows all the side branches
to be clipped off and ensures the graft to be long enough and to be
far away from the sternum, which can become very important in case of
redo surgery, for example. Heparin is administered, and an Endo-Bulldog
attached to a thread is then applied on the LIMA to control bleeding
after division distally. The pericardium is precisely incised in front
of the phrenic nerve and the diseased LAD comes immediately in sight.
The epicardial layer is removed from the LAD.
Multiple polypropylene stay
sutures are placed on both edges of the fatty epicardium, and the vessel
is surrounded in a wide arc with 4-0 atraumatic PTFE stitches. The pulsatile
blood flow in the LIMA is controlled once more, and the epicardial stay
sutures are fixed to immobilize the area in which the LAD is to be grafted.
The PFTE loops brought under tension can stop the coronary flow,
and the delicate anastomosis is carried out with 8-0 polypropylene in
the usual manner.
In most of the cases the ECG of the patient remained unchanged. With
an 11 mm autoclavable video thoracoscope, the left thoracic cavity is
checked for accurate homeostasis, and remaining bleeding vessels are
coagulated. Fig 2.
*
Results
The goals of our MIDCAB series,
which began 2 years ago, were to (1) provide a valid extrapolation to
the established long-term results of standard IMA grafting, (2) use
a full-length IMA graft, (3) to limit the indications to those cases
where complete revascularization of viable myocardium was possible,
and (4) use systematic control angiography. In order to obtain a full-length
IMA graft, we performed video-assisted takedown from the beginning of
the series.
There is an excellent transition
that can be installed through a somewhat larger thoracotomy, where takedown
of the IMA is begun in the lower portion under direct vision but continued
in the upper portion with video-assisted visualization, and then after
5 or 10 learning-curve cases, takedown of the entire length of the IMA
can be performed with video-assistance. Specific indications for our
series (n = 53) included muscle disorder in 1 patient, calcification
of the ascending aorta and arch in 1, previous malignancy in 4, noninsulin-dependent
or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in 9, chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease in 1, and 1 Jehovah's Witness. Contraindications were extreme
obesity, pleural adhesions, and diffuse distal coronary artery disease.
Anesthesia was administered through a double-lumen tube, and bradycardia
was induced with esmolol 0.1 to 0.25 mg/kg/min.
The heart was preconditioned
with lidoflazine 1 mg/kg. No aspirin or adenosine was used.
Intraoperatively,
there were no electrocardiogram changes or rhythm disturbances, although
slightly impeded regional wall motion in the interior wall was seen
occasionally on transesophageal echocardiography. There were 2 cases
of right ventricular bleeding that were easily treated with compression.
The mean duration of the procedure was 2 hours 50 minutes, ranging from
1 hour 30 minutes to 5 hours. We had no conversions to sternotomy and
used no cardiopulmonary bypass.
Forty-eight
of the first 50 patients (1 refused and 1 died) underwent systematic
control angiography, which showed that 46 of the IMAs were open, for
a patency rate of 95.8%.
Two patients at the beginning
of our experience were reoperated on postoperative days 8 and 2 and
had a small venous interposition on a dissected portion of the IMA.
After these 2 reoperations, the patency rate was 100%. Morbidity included
reoperation in 2 patients, revision for bleeding in 2, pleural effusion
in 6, hemothorax in 1, foot-drop in 1, supraventricular arrhythmia in
5, and wound infection in 1. Fig. 3 shows a patient breathing
spontaneously 1 hour after MIDCAB.
After 2 or 3 days, most of
these patients are able to return home.
In
the future, MIDCAB may be combined with other techniques to create a
5th category of procedures known as hybrid therapy; surgery with interventional
cardiology. MIDCAB may be performed using the left IMA to the LAD; used
in conjunction with interventional cardiology, perhaps on the circumflex
and right coronary arteries and in a hybrid strategy combined with prophylactic
measures for risk factors and plaque destabilization.
D.
True Port-AccessTM Cardiac Surgery
“Surgery
is exposure“ is an adagio that I kept hearing all the way during my
surgical training. Why is this? Well, two-pronged instruments and direct
vision are the answers. A traditional surgeon needs lots of space! But
how about bloodloss, inflammatory reaction, cracked ribs and possibly
devastating complications like sternitis & mediastinitis, let alone
the bad cosmetic result!
Let ' s imagine that
(1) we do not need the direct vision anymore and can rely -to a more
or lesser- degree upon video-assistance. Fig 3.
(2) we start to work with different instruments, “ shafted instruments
“ that we can handle trough trocar-port openings -Fig
4- and that
(3) we perform a percutaneous
ECC and occlude the aorta with an Endo-Aortic Balloon. By the way, this
is the system - par excellence - to do CPB assistance in the cath-lab
in case of a hemodynamic collapse because it can be installed in seconds.
These three conditions will allow us to work trough a “ working port
“ , which can be looked at in Figure 5.
Another widespread adage
“petite incision, petit chirurgien” - (small incision, small surgeon)
- arose from the use of the classic two-pronged forceps, scissors, and
suturing instruments and the direct view into the chest in conventional
surgery. But why open a patient' s chest today when there is another
viable option, even if new instruments and video-assisted enhanced visualization
are required?
It is up to you to decide;
the learning curve is for the surgeon. For the patient? Much less bloodloss,
no cracked thoracic cavity, let alone cartilages in the dust bin and
no devastating wound complications, much less pain and a sometimes astonishingly
fast rehabilitation as a result.
*
Optimizing Endo-CPB
Port-AccessTM Cardiac surgery
performs surgical acts to be performed through tiny ports in the intercostal
spaces. The big vessels are not easily accessible and therefore, new
methods to install the CPB and to arrest the heart are necessary to
allow surgery in a gold standard setting.
The
Achilles-heel of Port-AccessTM Surgery is the quite different way to
install CPB. It is necessary if one wants to work through a tiny “Port”
and will finally allow for “closed chest” cardiac surgery. A CPB system
that doesn't call for a big access and uses “Endo-vascular “ methods
can be called Endo-CPB. Not every patient is a good candidate for Endo-CPB.
So there are pre-operative
thresholds to be taken into account. Not every patient is a good candidate
for Endo-CPB. Good peripheral pulses are good enough a sign to decide
for Endo-CPB in most cases but, in doubt, a duplex or an IV angiography
can learn a lot. During the surgery, one has to know exactly when to
back off and/or convert to exclude additional risk and TEE will tell
everything about the right lumen, the passage through the right vessel
and the exact positioning of for example the endo-aortic balloon.
Heartport(r)'s
arterial cannula' s offer both retrograde and antegrade flow; the introduction
techniques are the Seldinger or “Stab” technique. Puncturing the femoral
artery is basic to have certainty about the right lumen and can avoid
clamping of a diseased vessel. Gentle passage of a guidewire and advancement
into the descending aorta will give the comforting image of a
free-floating guide on TEE, which is the sole measure of absolute safety.
Needless to say it has to be a soft-tip guidewire. Very seldom fluoroscopy
is needed to find your way through a tortuous iliac artery.
Needless to mention your
anesthesiologist has to be an expert in TEE but -preferably- the
surgeon should get himself a small monitor with the TEE image for increased
comfort ! The Heartport(r) arterial cannula comes in 21 and 23 french
and it is suitable for introduction over a guide wire. The only thing
you need is a dilator. The Y-arm allows for safe introduction of the
Endo-Aortic Clamp eventually.
A recent Heartport(r) cannula
is the Endo-directTM. It can be stabbed into the ascending aorta trough
a trocar port. It' s got a Y-arm too, to bring in the Endo-aortic balloon
above the sino-tubular junction. The access is shorter, it gives antegrade
flow and the balloon will be less keen to migration. TEE always will
guide in positioning the Endo-ClampTM. On the other hand, you 'll need
a safe trip home after decannulation...
Venous cannulation calls for the same safety measures, that is to say
puncture of the lumen and Seldinger technique. Fig
6. It can be done percutaneously if it' s the sole cannulation
in the groin.
Kinetic assistance is necessary
for a single or double stage femoral cannula, that comes from 21 to
28 french. Jugular cannulation is done by the anesthesiologist. DLP
offers a 14 or 17 french cannula that is very suitable. The advantage
is a tube-free right atrium for ASD, myxoma or tricuspid surgery.
The
pulmonary venting cannula that Heartport(r)offers is very useful in
mitral and coronary artery surgery. It can prevent a lot of backbleeding
in the left atrium and will prevent blood from being sequestrated in
the lungs, where lysis of leucocytes can have devastating effects.
Safe
cardiac arrest is a challenge in Port-AccessTM surgery. The technology
of the Heartport(r) Endo-aortic clamp allows endo-aortic balloon inflation
to occlude the lumen and the delivery of antegrade cardioplegia. There
is continuous improvement of the balloon and we're at the fifth generation
balloons at the present time.
Learning the technicity of safe balloon positioning asks for fluoroscopic
control in the beginning but about 30 cases should suffice to rely completely
on TEE. Fig 7.
The anesthesiologist will
give the exact diameter of the ascending aorta, 30mm for example, and
this will usually roughly corroborate with a 30cc injected volume and
300mm mercury of balloon pressure.
The balloon is inflated with
a small amount of fluid initially and when you' ve got it floating in
the blood-flow like a kite in the wind the catheter is pulled
back to be blocked to the cannula and prevent the balloon from migrating.
Antegrade cardioplegia can always be completed with a dose of retrograde
- if necessary - trough a coronary sinus catheter that can be introduced
safely - under TEE control - through one of the necksheats.
The
remaining major challenges of Endo-CPB are:
• One doesn't have the right
to damage the peripheral vessel that is cannulated. Once more, pre-operative
thinking, proper Seldinger technique and good monitoring are the cornerstones
to avoid it.
• We have to face the unacceptable
issue of aortic dissection and there is no way this complication can
be swept under the rock: in terms of technology a lot has been done
yet: softer guidewires, better catheters. Thresholds and technique come
into play again to avoid the problem. Wisdom should always exclude zeal.
A lot is expected from the Endo-direct cannula. Larger series have to
prove the high expectations.
• So far, a small cutdown
is needed to close the femoral access. No clamping is necessary as insertion
of a fogarty catheter can prevent the artery from important backbleeding
but we finally want to see safe percutaneous placement of endovascular
cannula's. No problem for the venous cannulation but an automatic closure
device of the arterial cannulation-site is to be found.
• De-airing shouldn't be
a problem with the right measures. They're all here: CO2 flushing of
the operative field, PA-Vent Stop, Silicone ventricular venting and
start ventilate the left lung, Trendelenburg & CC Rotation of the
table, Retrograde Cardioplegia, Deflation of the Balloon and Balloon
Tip & Ventricular Aspiration
• The summary is: there is
a huge task left for the industry: make CPB more bio-compatible as we'll
never get rid of it completely
*
Port-AccessTM Mitral Valve Surgery
*
Introduction
Right thoracotomy is a well
known alternative for mid-sternotomy to have access to the left atrium.
Port-Access(tm) approach is an invaluable option to avoid cracking of
ribs and cartilages. Endo-CPB(tm) and Endo-aortic clamp allows installation
of the ECC and cardiac arrest from the groin. Video-assistance and shafted
instruments are the surgeon' s help to do the surgery through a five
by two cm port and fulfil the main goals of minimally invasive cardiac
surgery, comfort, cosmesis and fast rehabilitation.
*
Technique
The patient is installed
in dorsal decubitus with an inflatable pillow under the right
kidney and in the right inframammary groove, a 6 cm incision is made.
A needle is inserted in the 4th intercostal space to fill the thoracic
cavity with CO2. Heartport' s soft tissue retractor is inserted into
the intercostal incision and the rib retractor will create a nicely
tilted 5x 2 cm “ working port “.
A 5 mm intercostal port is
created on the front axillary line in the 3rd or the 4th IC space to
allow the thoracoscope to come into the thoracic cavity. The CO2 line
is attached to this port to have continuous flushing of the cardiac
cavities with CO2. Another 5 mm port is created parasternally under
thoracoscopic vision to avoid the internal thoracic artery. It will
receive the handle of the left atrial retractor. A third 10 mm port
is created on the front axillary line in the 7th or 8th IC space.
It allows the Teflon felt
reinforced stay sutures on the centrum tendineum of the diaphragm to
be brought out of the thorax and fixed to bring down the diaphragmatic
dome. It will serve as an introduction port for the atrial venting cannula
and the thoracic drainage tube.
See figure.
When
the extra corporeal circulation is started, the pericardium is incised
and opened along the phrenic nerve and stay sutures can open it widely
by bringing them out of the thoracic cavity on the middle axillary line
by means of an Endo-CloseTM. The upper curtain of the pericardium is
attached to the thoracic wall and the dissection of the interatrial
septum is started.
After arresting the heart
by delivering antegrade cardioplegia, the zero degree 5 mm thoracoscope
shows a completely flaccid heart and after both the aortic root and
the pulmonary artery are vented, the left atrium is incised with specific
shafted forceps and scissors. The handle of the atrial retractor system
is then brought to the parasternal port, the most appropriate blade
attached to it and the right atrium complete retracted. At that time
the zero degree thoracoscope is pushed forward and can give a great
view of the mitral valve.
In some instances the thirty degree thoracoscope that comes in from
a different angle can give better a better working space. Fig
8.
In Mitral Valve Replacement,
the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve can be preserved completely
while the anterior leaflet can be resected except for its free edge
close to the postero-medial commissure. Reinforced 2/0 Ticron U-stitches
bring the free edge towards the annulus and they are nicely disposed
on suture guides outside the patient. With a valve sizer the appropriate
size can be prepared.
The valve is pushed to the working port sometimes with the help of a
shoe-horn! The thoracoscope can then nicely visualize its descend along
the U-stitches into its position in the mitral annulus with the help
of the valve seater. Fig 9.
All the knots are tied extracorporeally and they are pushed into place
with the Heartport(r) knot pusher. Fig 10.
It allows the surgeon to
tie a rapid succession of throws and tighten each of them firmly against
the sewing ring. A silicon suction tube is placed through the valve
and the patient is placed into Trendelenburg and lateral decubitus to
secure proper deairing procedure. Remember that the entire operative
field is continuously flooded with CO2.
One lateral opening of this
silicone tube is kept outside the closure of the atriotomy to visualize
proper de-airing. The heart starts to beat slowly when the balloon is
deflated and the routine procedure for weaning from the extracorporeal
circulation is commenced.
Mitral
leaflets can be nicely repaired and an annuloplasty-ring perfectly placed
under video-assisted visualization. The surgeon is looking at a screen
while his shafted instruments are working into the patients left atrium.
A third degree thoracoscope
can give better visualization when U-stitches are in place in the mitral
annulus. The “Port-Access” Cardiac Surgeon will have to get accustomed
to the use of the shafted instruments and has to develop the proper
eye-hand coordination for video-assisted surgery.
Video-assisted
visualization is very important to have perfect inspection when a thromboendarterectomy
of the left atrium and the left atrial appendix is carried out. The
visualization system has to provide proper colour, contrast, resolution,
field of view and depth of field to fulfil these surgical acts properly.
Three dimensional video-assisted visualization may become extremely
helpful to achieve very delicate repairs of both anterior and posterior
mitral valve leaflets.
Obviously, there is no need
for a wider access thanks to the video-assisted visualization, the shafted
instruments and the Endo-PCB and Endo-Aortic Clamp system, but it will
take the surgeon some time to get accustomed to a completely new way
of working. The obvious benefits for the patient are better comfort,
optimal cosmesis and a faster rehabilitation.
*
Results
From February 1997 until
November 1998, 68 patients (36 M/32 F) had either Port-Access(tm)
mitral valve repair (n=38) or replacement (n=30) for a variety of pathology:
myxoid degeneration (40), rheumatic disease (19), chronic endocarditis
(4), annular dilatation (2) and sclerotic disease (1). One valve was
replaced due to an ingrowing myxoma. There was one closure of a paravalvular
leak.
The mean age was 60 year
(33-83). Most patients had normal ejection fractions but different grades
of mitral valve insufficiency and were in NYHA class II.
One 71-year-old patient died
after reoperation on POD 1 for failed repair.
One patient had conversion
to sternotomy and conventional ECC for repair of his dissected aorta;
he suffered minor cerebrovascular defects. The mean endoaortic clamp
time and endoCPB time was 104 (35-160) and 147 minutes (75-215)
respectively, mean ICU-stay: 2 days and mean hospital stay:
nine days (4-36). A significant difference between the first 30 and
last 38 patients in terms of length of stay ICU and hospital was
noticed. Two late mitral valve replacements for acute endocarditis after
repair occurred.
The
debut of Port-Access(tm) Mitral Valve Surgery may be nerve-racking,
the routine is a smooth and sure operation with maximum comfort, a very
discrete scar and a fast rehabilitation as a result for the patient.
There were no paravalvular leakages nor myocardial infarctions.
Cerebro-vascular accidents due to trombo-embolic phenomena, vascular
lower limb or wound complications were not seen.
Port-Access(tm) Mitral Valve
surgery is a very important investment in the future of cardiac surgery.
Some “learning curve” pitfalls were associated with the process
of starting this revolutionary technique.
*
Port-AccessTM CABG
*
Introduction
How long does it take for
a young healthy individual to get rid of his catabolic state after breaking
his femur: 6 weeks ! You may guess this ' ll be 3 months for a 60-year
old patient with coronary artery insufficiency when his breastbone is
split. However, median sternotomy has the obvious advantage that you
can do direct vision surgery with your conventional two-pronged
instruments and that' s were the old quote: surgery is exposure comes
from !
But how about cracked ribs,
considerable loss of blood, impaired integrity of the thoracic cage
and its consequences on ventilatory function, pain, ugly scars and the
incidence of sternitis - up to 2,4 % in large series when both the MIA'
s are taken down.
*
Technique
In Port-AccessTM surgery,
the “working port” is created through a 7 cm skin incision in the inframammary
groove. In a female patient you have to work your way up to the level
of the fourth IC space. The soft tissue retractor is of great help to
organize your port.
A TM retractor is installed
to create lift between the pericardial cavity and the chest wall. Sometimes,
in an obese patient, the pericardial fat has to be removed up
to the level of the phrenic nerve. Impossible to take down the IMA without
cracking more ribs and cartilages - or brake your own neck -without
proper video-assistance.
A 10 mm camera head is mounted
through a stabilizing device and then brought through the 11 mm port
to have a look in the thoracic cavity.
The whole decourse of the left IMA becomes visible from its take-off
to the level of the diaphragm. Fig 11.
The take-down is started
in the mid-portion and continued up and down. Shafted instruments are
introduced through the “working port”. No way you can see something
inside without the video-assistance. Two-dimensional images perfectly
allow you to do this take-down when they provide you with proper
contrast, resolution and colour.
The RIMA can be taken down
the same way and introduced from the right side in the pericardial cavity
for revascularisation of LAD. Instructions can be given to residents
and assistants for training purposes. I think it has become basic to
train young surgeons for video-assisted surgery to be able to face upcoming
challenges in MICS like closed chest CABG.
The Heartport(r) Endo-bulldogTM is applied to the IMA through the camera
port to avoid it from obstructing the working port. Fig
12.
A
proximal anastomosis can be made to the ascending aorta the usual way
after withdrawal of the endo-aortic balloon to the arch and the application
of a side-bite clamp. The aorta can be approximated to the working port
by “traction” stay-sutures to the right sided pericardium. The video-assistance
is needed as an internal light source but the suturing is done “direct
vision”.
The distal anastomoses are
made on the flaccid heart that can be turned around and fixed in any
position to have the anastomotic site close to the working port. Shafted
instruments are needed but the suturing is done with direct vision.
It is virtually impossible to do two-dimensional video-directed suturing
on a 2mm vessel, because of the magnified image, that is away and above
the hands and that accentuates lack of precision and tremor, the
lack of visual depth perception, the disconnected eye-hand coordination
and the limited range of motion and sensory feedback.
Computer-enhanced instruments
will be needed to perform “trocar” Port-AccessTM CABG Surgery.
*
Results & Discussion
The Results of Port-AccessTM
CABG are depicted in the figures 13 -14 - 15 -
16.
... ... ...
When
a revascularisation is needed one should always at least think of being
less invasive!
As there are two sources
of invasiveness - the access and the CPB - one should make sure you've
got the right answer to this question: What is the biggest invasion
for this specific patient?
There is more: in order to
make the right, that is to say the unbiased decision: every surgeon
should make sure he's got a complete armamentarium to do less invasive
surgery!
If it is the CPB for a very
specific reason -renal, recent CVA, calcified aorta, malign tumour,
Jehova witness - avoid it at all costs, and make it a principle to try
to stay away from the pump in elderly people where the number of targets
is low >OPCAB
If it is the maxi-access
in patients where fast rehabilitation and/or cosmesis is important to
get back to work and/or sport and the number of target is not to impressive,
Port-AccessTM is the way to go.
Wherever complete and/or
arterial revascularisation is “mandatory” and would be at risk with
either technique, go for the conventional way.
Wherever Lima to LAD is the
only important thing, MIDCAB is a great operation although the learning
curve is probably the most important there.
Maybe we should always keep
in our mind somewhere that there is the possibility of concentrating
on the important lesions on LAD and tributaries through a small access
on- or off-pump and “leave” the rest to the cardiologists in a Hybrid
therapy strategy.
The most important thing
is that surgeons do the right job for the patient in front of them:
some of these will definitely benefit from op-cab, some will be delighted
with Port-AccessTM surgery. So, let's bury the hatchet among interventional
cardiologists, OPCABbers and Port-Accessers.
*
Port-AccessTM ASD & Myxoma Surgery
* Introduction
The best results in terms
of comfort, cosmesis and fast rehabilitation can be obtained in surgery
for ASD and Myxoma resection respecting the supreme quality of standard
cardiac surgery. Fig 17.
* Technique
in Port-AccessTM ASD and
Myxoma Surgery the introduction of a jugular cannula is very useful
to have the right atrium completely free. Fig
18.
Taping of both caval veins
can be done the usual way with snares that can be brought out of the
thoracic cavity with the “Endo-CloseTM”.
After installation of Endo-CPB and Endo-ClampTM the right and/or the
left atrium are opened to close the interatrial defect with or without
a patch and to remove a myxoma and his attachment to the interatrial
septum or the free left atrial wall. Fig 19.
*
Results & Discussion
Since Heartport(r) obtained
CE-Mark for its Endo-CPB and Endo-Aortic Clamp technology, fifteen patients
with a median age of 45 years had ASD-closure and four patients
(mean age: 54 years) had a removal of a left atrial myxoma. No mortality
occurred.
One myxoma patient needed
renal dialysis postoperatively.
Mean
CPB time
ASD 97
Myxoma85
Mean
crossclamp time
ASD 58
MIXOMA 69
Mean
ICU stay
ASD 1day
Mixoma 1day
Mean
hospital stay
ASD 6 days
Mixoma 7 days
Right
thoracotomy is a well known approach for right and left atrial cardiac
surgery. Port-Access(tm) surgery can avoid cracking of ribs and cartilages
and limit bloodloss to an absolute minimum. The postoperative course
was painless because of the absence of retraction and the effectiveness
of epidural anesthesia. The mean length of the skin incision was 5 cm.
Some younger patients were back to work or sports activities after two
weeks.
The main goals of minimally
invasive cardiac surgery, that is to say comfort, cosmesis and fast
rehabilitation can be achieved in Port-Access(tm) Cardiac surgery for
ASD and Myxoma, respecting the high standards of conventional cardiac
surgery. Figures 20 and 21.
.....
*
The first Live Tele-Conference on Port-AccessTM Cardiac Surgery was
held in Brussels in February 1998.
The
aim of the Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Clinic Live-Teleconference was to provide
attendants with valuable information about
• which patients to select
for Port-AccessTM Cardiac surgery, since it is of the outmost importance
that the best opportunities are selected to start the learning curve
of PA Surgery
• the effectiveness and safety
of Endo-CPB and Endo-Aortic Clamp technology and the invaluable
support of TEE in the hands of an expert
• tips and techniques for
optimal video-assisted visualization, which is, I think vital to stick
to the rules of true PA Surgery.
• the use of shafted
instruments through a “working port”
• and the clinical results
in terms of comfort, cosmesis and rehabilitation, which obviously are
the main goals of every MI technique
The
Surgery was performed at the Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Clinic while the attendants
sat comfortably in an amphitheatre at a huge cinema complex in Brussels
in front of two giant side-by-side screens to witness the action in
the theatre, both trough the eyes of the thoracoscopes and the surgeon'
s staff's eyes.
Five
Operative procedures were carried out, starting with CAB-Surgery and
ASD closure the first day.
Four patients were interviewed
on the first post-operative day on ICU to assess their clinical condition.
All of them had been extubated two hours after surgery and all were
ready to leave intensive care for the ward.
The
second day of the teleconference concentrated on Mitral Valve surgery.
A 70-year old lady had MV replacement with preservation of the entire
plicated posterior leaflet and the postero-medial part of the free edge
of the anterior leaflet. In Mitral valve reconstructive Surgery,
a lot of the work was done while the surgeon was completely relying
on the video-screen.
Placing of “U” stitches
in the annulus, accurate quadrangular resection and classical sliding
plasty with tying of 5/0 prolene was achieved with comparable results
to conventional surgery, which was demonstrated both by the preoperative
and the postoperative TEE control.
What
the attendants could not witness is the fact that all patients operated
on were home on the fourth or fifth post-operative day. Port-AccessTM
cardiac Surgery is demanding for the cardiac surgeon, certainly in the
period where he has to get accustomed to the new concepts for endo-CPB
and endo-aortic clamp, quite new ways to visualize structures and perform
surgery on these structures with new instruments.
All the attendants agreed
tough that Port-AccessTM cardiac Surgery could be on the verge of becoming
the surgery of the twenty-first century.
The
Future: Robotic Cardiac Surgery
The
first step in Port-AccessTM is “avoiding sternotomy” and doing remote-access
CPB and cardiac arrest.
The second step: with lots of tips and techniques one can to come to
true “port” surgery like the kind of approach where no ribs are cracked,
no cartilages dislocated let alone removed and a retraction that is
often limited to the soft tissue retractor ! Fig
22.
The ultimate step is “trocar”
port surgery: the manipulation of Endo-surgery instruments can be awkward
through “trocar” ports.
Fine
suturing of distal anastomoses cannot be achieved with the sole flat
image of a two-dimensional camera. The surgery becomes virtually impossible
due to the followings aspects: the magnified image, that is away and
above the hands and that accentuates lack of precision and tremor,
the lack of visual depth perception, the disconnected eye-hand coordination
and the limited range of motion and sensory feedback. Fig
23.
Intuitive
Surgical provides the surgeon with an eight times magnifying, six chip
three-dimensional image and shafted, remote-controlled endo-wrist instruments
manipulators on a huge cart, next to the patient.
The surgeon is sitting at
a console, away from the patient, where both his left and right eye
have a separate monitor and his hands are manipulating joy-sticks that
look like the jaws of a gastroviejo and electronically translate every
single move from the surgeon in a customized scale difference to extremely
precise acts inside the patient' s chest.
The stunning fact about the
“playstation” is the amazingly short learning curve. The system can
take surgical precision and technique beyond the limits of the human
hand.
We
had the opportunity to clinically testdrive the intuitive system in
December 1998. For time-saving and safety purposes we elected to make
one 2,5 cm working port and two trocar ports. At the OLV-Clinic two
patients had “closed” chest cardiac Surgery.
In a 38yr old lady, three
separate holes in the interatrial septum were closed. A 57yr old lady
had a single LIMA to LAD bypass. Both interventions were finished in
less then four hours and both patients went home on the third postoperative
day.
The
combined application of the Heartport (r) technology and the Intuitive
surgical system allow the surgeon to perform very precise surgical acts
on the heart through “trocar” ports. Going for the ultimate goals of
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery without compromising surgical safety
and precision has become possible.
One thing is for sure: it
is heavy, massive equipment and it is a huge investment but they allow
the endo-surgeon to work very instinctively. The future will tell us
where the benefit of these computer-enhanced instruments exactly is
and much more experience is needed to overview the array of possibilities
to these rapidly evolving technologies but they can give mini-access
surgery a huge leap forwards.
Discussion
I
actually do not like the term Minimally Invasive cardiac Surgery, the
least invasive cardiac intervention obviously being PTCA: no pain, no
scar & immediate rehabilitation.
Some surgeons who confine
their sternotomy to two thirds of the sternum think they' re doing Minimally
Invasive Cardiac Interventions.
Well the name of the game
is fashion: everybody wants to be in this trendy game, apples are compared
with oranges and there is a lot of confusion going on, so we definitely
have to adopt a common way to classify different forms of MICS and we
should at least try to determine those that, we think will stand the
test of time, differentiate the truly revolutionary ones from
the ones that are mere fashion.
A
couple of thoughts,
* Big-Size tennis rackets
were just fashionable in the early seventies but we don't see a single
small wooden racket anymore these days.
* Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
looked like hell to some surgeons in the early nineties, but nobody
would dare propose a laparotomy for cholecystectomy at the present time.
* You have to crack the thoracic
cavity to a big extend to have an exposure that allows you to
work with the same direct vision and the tools Alexis Carrel worked
with in 1903.
* It takes a young healthy
individual 6 weeks to get rid of his catabolic state after braking
his femur ! So you bet this 'll be 3 months for a 60-year old when his
breastbone is split and the cavity cracked
* Sternotomies have identical
effects, all over the world, but all CPB systems are different: closed
or open, various tubings, aspirations and primings, crushing rollerpumps
or softer biomedicus pumps
* Remains the fact that Blood-Air
interface & pulmonary sequestration of leucocytes are very bad aspects
of ECC, the worst being melted fat and bone wax dripping in the suckers!
* The best way to predict the future is to invent it ! The challenge
is much more a mental one than a technical ! Figure
24.
But
there is more: nobody ever stated what MICS should be.
What are the rules of the
game?
* We know the paradigms but
these goals are achieved to a different extend in different categories
of MICS and
* we need to prove the quality
of the procedure is the same.
* Cost-efficiency remains
arguable, but -by the way- ABS brake systems were extremely expensive
in the early eighties but part of the standard equipment of a small
car today because nobody' s still arguing about their efficacy! Robotic
Cardiac Surgery has a long way to go before it ' ll be able to prove
cost-efficiency.
Fortunately, at the end of
this century, we can already have a glimpse of next century' s surgery
with this machine that allows tool changes and can provide you with
complete three-dimensional video-play-station.
* The fourth criterium, namely
the surgical aspects will have to be simple, predictable and ensure
absolute safety one day, which is not the case yet today. Problems for
surgical training ? No ! the joy-stick generation is born already and
waiting to play with these tools !
Hugo Vanermen, MD
Chief, Department of Cardiovascular
and Thoracic Surgery,
Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Clinic,
Aalst, Belgium
|