..............
 
Francesco Milandri
 
 
  Only Italian   Italian - English
 
“First you vote and then I will answer”. This is how Fedele Confalonieri hissed all those who put questions and asked for some explanations about the resolutions submitted to their approval during Mediaset's meeting. “Excuse me, Mr. President - a shareholder dared say - but my vote is subordinate to some explanations that must be given to me”. “Just vote as you want” was Fedele Confalonieri's annoyed answer.   
As if to say that the entire board of directors and the majority shareholders - with Silvio Berlusconi on top of the list - weren't absolutely interested in what minor shareholders could think or do ! So that was what they meant by transparency and disclosure! Mediaset - as everyone knows - owns the three television Canale 5, Italia 1 and Rete 4, but it is also the same company that asked savers a huge amount of money by inducing them to subscribe about 126,5 million shares that, along with the so-called institutional investors' shares, allowed Berlusconi's Fininvest - still the majority shareholder - to earn over 1000 billion lira and Mediaset almost the same figure.   
One would be induced to write “once on shore we pray no more”, or, in other words, we cashed the money, now minor shareholders please back off!   
To tell the truth, Mediaset and its President's style was already unquestionably evident in the notice calling the shareholders' meeting that listed the following agenda:   
“1) Resolutions regarding the social boards.   
2) Resolutions according to articles 2357 and 2357 ter of the Civil Code”.   
This “recondite” text, for the large number of non experts - as in similar companies normally happens - should and could have been more simply and clearly written as:   
1) Integration of the Board of Directors and of the Board of Auditors.   
2) Purchase of treasury shares”. Maybe, Mediaset thought, if we divulge that it is about purchasing shares, people might want to know more. So we'd better say nothing. And, to hide it further, no reports were made available in the days preceding the meeting. Nothing! Absolutely nothing! The report - fewer than two typewritten pages with wide side margins - was given at the meeting.   
Just a few lines to illustrate (as it should have) a considerable financial operation that should have influenced the quotation of the stock. Thus, only the few people were at the meeting - fewer than 30 with respect to the hundreds of thousands of shareholders belonging to the stock ledger - knew (at the last moment) that a purchase of treasury shares for the small figure of about 1000 (one thousand billion!) billion lira would have been deliberated, than the board would have been empowered to decide when to sell and when to buy, and that it would have had the incredible discretion in the purchase and sell of a difference equal to over or fewer than 20% (twenty per cent!) on the reference price recorded by the stock in the exchange preceding every single operation.   
Thus, Fedele Confalonieri asked for a blank vote regarding a 1000 billion lira operation and so wide and strong powers.   
The truth is that Fedele Confalonieri had already agreed with important shareholders - those supporting his board - about the operation in all its details, so that giving some explanations to fifteen or so have-nots was an unbearable waste time for him. Well done Fedele Confalonieri.   
And a Donato Pellegrino did well too: he represented some four million shares of the Banca Commerciale Italiana (Comit) at the meeting but did not intervene to support those who were being bullied.   
We hope that in the report that he certainly had to present to his superiors at Comit, Donato Pellegrino made it clear that by supporting and advocating Fedele Confalonieri's behaviour, Comit would have damaged its own image.   
Comit's meetings, in fact, are always a paragon of style, competence and respect of minorities' right.   
It is a fact, however, that Donato Pellegrino's silent-assent worked well for the bank it was representing. Similar considerations must be made regarding Andrea Mayr's behaviour who, at the meeting, was the holder of over 10 million shares of Istituto Mobiliare Italiano.   
We hope that President Luigi Arcuti and General Manager (and former Minister) Stefano Rainer Masera did not approve their representative's work.   
And what about the silence of Dario Trevisan and Franco Carulli who represented a large part of foreign investors and several American investment funds at the meeting? If we mention the respect and the attention minor savers enjoy in the United States, we are induced to believe that Dario Trevisan and Franco Carulli are neglecting to refer their representatives about Fedele Confalonieri's methods.   
Judging by the way the meeting went, that took place in a television studio at Cologno Monzese, one would expect to see the sign “Welcome to the joke show, minor shareholders!” at the end of the meeting.   
In the name of freedom of information always called for, Mediaset actually “darkened” its shareolders. We hope that Mr. Berlusconi was properly informed by his son Pier Silvio and his daughter Marina who represent him at Mediaset's Board of Directors. 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The President of Mediaset, 
Confalonieri Fedele. 
 
  
 Italian Leadership®  
  Mensile di Economia, Attualita` e Cultura  
 Copyright 1997© All Rights Reserved 
 
 This page are maintenened by  
GTM Grafica 
Service & Network 
gtmgraph@coloseum.com